Immigration Is A Toxic Environment
Biden Must Remedy That
Unpublished
Authored By: Bradley Chapline
Las Vegas, Nevada
4 February 2021
Biden Must Remedy That
Unpublished
Authored By: Bradley Chapline
Las Vegas, Nevada
4 February 2021
In 1982, the United States Supreme Court, in the case of "Plyer versus Doe", made an utterly alarming decision that gave undocumented school-aged children of illegal aliens specific rights on U.S. soil.
"Alarming", meaning that, this Supreme Court decision opened the flood gates of illegal immigration into the United States.
The Supreme Bench at that specific time, was headed by Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, a liberal. Justice Burger recognized that education was crucial to preventing a permanent underclass of undocumented immigrants in the United States.
Therefore, Plyer vs Doe, was a landmark case. It held that states cannot constitutionally deny students a free public education on account of their immigration status.
The repercussions in this case against our justice, immigration and educational systems became a political hotbed of confusion, contempt, and civil unrest.
However, in looking for workable solutions, it must be realized, first, there are no current lines available for unauthorized immigrants in which to possibly gain a path to citizenship. By current law, those who have entered the U.S. through unauthorized channels shall remain illegals for their lifetime.
Bearing this in mind, it would be in America's best interests to immediately create a nationwide vetting process that would provide, potentially, citizenship to 11.1 million illegal immigrants living in America.
Additionally, and most importantly, this would allow America's legislators to move away from a presently snarled and muddled immigration system.
New, consistent, and stronger immigration laws could then be universally enacted on a politically bipartisan basis,
Failure to do so, and America's illegal alien population, by 2065, will grow to approximately 118 million, and 82% of America's population growth. All in all, a projected cost, annually, of 1.6 trillion dollars to the American taxpayer.
Replies
(1) To Author
(1) WRONG ... and the vast majority if Americans are unlikely to support any such action.
It is NOT in America's interest to do and pay for the social services that are the responsibility of each state for their citizens ..
It is in America's interest to compete for the best and brightest from around the world to keep our nation's innovations going and a future for the next generations .. .. America does not need the best nannies or gardeners who cost far more that they bring (hen we know that the top 2% pay over 50% on income taxes ....)
(2) Reply To (1)
The big problem with that ruling was the huge cost of educating children of illegal immigrants. The ones brought in during the Obama border surges were largely uneducated and did not know the alphabet or numbers and could not "name" colors. They spoke dialects that were often obscure. They needed extensive remedial help and translators. Each special classroom costs about $250k per year, at least. This puts a huge burden on so many schools and takes up the money that was planned for music, language and art classes and crowded classrooms. As this has the potential to hurt every public school system as a test of border policies at the federal level then schools need to be a part of the consideration of immigration policy.
Author To (1)
(2) Your thinking is conservatively flawed. Read again and comprehend this time:
"Failure to do so, and America's illegal alien population, by 2065, will grow to approximately 118 million, and 82% of America's population growth. All in all, a projected cost, annually, of 1.6 trillion dollars to the American taxpayer."
Now which option is best for America, yours or mine?
(1) To Author
(1) The best option is a few "residency" papers given to those her more than 2 decades.
Anyone who entered less than 15 years ago leaves and makes a formal request from outside the country.
WHICH country do you know of that allows people to enter illegally, live illegally, get social services illegally and then are rewarded with citizenship?
Author To (1)
What is the matter with you? I'm not saying you are wrong in what you've written. But, our options are limited. Do you want 11.1 million more citizens here in America, or a population explosion of illegals that will sooner or later bust our financial system to smithereens.
"Alarming", meaning that, this Supreme Court decision opened the flood gates of illegal immigration into the United States.
The Supreme Bench at that specific time, was headed by Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, a liberal. Justice Burger recognized that education was crucial to preventing a permanent underclass of undocumented immigrants in the United States.
Therefore, Plyer vs Doe, was a landmark case. It held that states cannot constitutionally deny students a free public education on account of their immigration status.
The repercussions in this case against our justice, immigration and educational systems became a political hotbed of confusion, contempt, and civil unrest.
However, in looking for workable solutions, it must be realized, first, there are no current lines available for unauthorized immigrants in which to possibly gain a path to citizenship. By current law, those who have entered the U.S. through unauthorized channels shall remain illegals for their lifetime.
Bearing this in mind, it would be in America's best interests to immediately create a nationwide vetting process that would provide, potentially, citizenship to 11.1 million illegal immigrants living in America.
Additionally, and most importantly, this would allow America's legislators to move away from a presently snarled and muddled immigration system.
New, consistent, and stronger immigration laws could then be universally enacted on a politically bipartisan basis,
Failure to do so, and America's illegal alien population, by 2065, will grow to approximately 118 million, and 82% of America's population growth. All in all, a projected cost, annually, of 1.6 trillion dollars to the American taxpayer.
Replies
(1) To Author
(1) WRONG ... and the vast majority if Americans are unlikely to support any such action.
It is NOT in America's interest to do and pay for the social services that are the responsibility of each state for their citizens ..
It is in America's interest to compete for the best and brightest from around the world to keep our nation's innovations going and a future for the next generations .. .. America does not need the best nannies or gardeners who cost far more that they bring (hen we know that the top 2% pay over 50% on income taxes ....)
(2) Reply To (1)
The big problem with that ruling was the huge cost of educating children of illegal immigrants. The ones brought in during the Obama border surges were largely uneducated and did not know the alphabet or numbers and could not "name" colors. They spoke dialects that were often obscure. They needed extensive remedial help and translators. Each special classroom costs about $250k per year, at least. This puts a huge burden on so many schools and takes up the money that was planned for music, language and art classes and crowded classrooms. As this has the potential to hurt every public school system as a test of border policies at the federal level then schools need to be a part of the consideration of immigration policy.
Author To (1)
(2) Your thinking is conservatively flawed. Read again and comprehend this time:
"Failure to do so, and America's illegal alien population, by 2065, will grow to approximately 118 million, and 82% of America's population growth. All in all, a projected cost, annually, of 1.6 trillion dollars to the American taxpayer."
Now which option is best for America, yours or mine?
(1) To Author
(1) The best option is a few "residency" papers given to those her more than 2 decades.
Anyone who entered less than 15 years ago leaves and makes a formal request from outside the country.
WHICH country do you know of that allows people to enter illegally, live illegally, get social services illegally and then are rewarded with citizenship?
Author To (1)
What is the matter with you? I'm not saying you are wrong in what you've written. But, our options are limited. Do you want 11.1 million more citizens here in America, or a population explosion of illegals that will sooner or later bust our financial system to smithereens.